Opinion and the other

(America is made up of European waste) thus describes the British Queen "Elizabeth," of human existence and cultural acceleration, which hit the American continent. After that was discovered by "Christopher Columbus" and exterminated its indigenous population "Indians" by migrants who reach it to escape the brutal wars that were ravaging the continent old. And the war itself has made "George Washington" American independence while making "Abraham Lincoln" in the same way the U.S. unit. But the real goal has not yet been achieved, there was a more complex task of achieving independence and unity, namely "how to keep them" in light of nationalities and ethnicities and even languages and beliefs conflicting sprawling on the ground. They had to pressure people to create contradictions smoothly. In 1890 Mutan Hall burdens of the young State, which was like a time bomb does not know when and how to explode the voices of those calling for the expansion and proliferation, especially those who have accumulated to have a lot of money and the numbers are staggering through and during the civil war and who fear erosion of their capital or loss and therefore were see that the solution to many of the problems that beset the country Hua out of the continent and perhaps that one of the most famous interventions during the discussions of Congress in 1898 stated in the letter of Senator, "Albert Beverdj" Member of the Council on the mandate of the "Virginia" delivered a speech titled "march of science" where in which he said (we have to erect tent beyond freedom in the West and beyond in the south .. that the issue is not about America, but a matter of time invites us to crawl under the flag .. even spread of freedom and hold the blessing to everyone .. that freedom worthy of all peoples, which can rule The same people who can not the sacred duty before God to lead us to the American model in the life of a model of honor with the right ...). It is certain that the occupation of Iraq was not for that purpose, as well as Afghanistan. Says "Lenin" in his book "Imperialism _ the highest stage of capitalism" in 1917 (the cause of a trend in the rate of profit land trying to capitalist economies developed to stop this deterioration, through colonial expansion and behavior imperialist and such a need inherent in order to accommodate the surplus of capital available kinetic of international relations these economies are interpreted imperialism, war and political change, the international law of uneven development), while the writer says, "Stanley Karnov" in his book "American Empire" (It is possible that the ocean protection to the oceans buffer and if I want to retain the terms it is necessary to cross) in the while the naval officers, led by Admiral "Stephen Los" believe there should be turning the United States to a state of war, saying (because the war experience has no peer in strengthening the unity of the people and detect stiffness Madenhaotencit concerned with and lighten the minds and Daiha to make good use of their material and moral). Although the United States adopted the method of purchase and occupation in access to land and islands, but they did not enter in direct conflict with Alimbratoriatvee then, such as Portuguese, Spanish, British and others, and even during the First World War in 1914 did not enter the war and claimed neutrality, but it had been monitoring the from a distance and count the results. Having exhausted the First World War and the subsequent wars, local and foreign empires old, dilapidated and found these in the Second World War in 1945 as the war entered its terms declared the emergence of a new imperial era. The objective of the conflict in the mixed block allies France and Britain looking to stay Ptkhalsa of the Germans in the United States while looking for hegemony and control over oil resources in the world. To the degree that "Winston Churchill," he said in a speech to the American President, "Franklin Roosevelt" by saying (Onnimdtr that Asarg to say that U.S. policy in matters of Middle East oil seems to many of my colleagues in the Council of Ministers attempt to inherit the legacy of a man is still alive) in the while the "Mohammed Hassanein Heikal" tells what he heard on the conversations between the author "and Altrlbiman" President "Gamal Abdel Nasser" in 1957. where he says (Mr. President, we do not have to fear the British Empire, we are the reasons many of them and the unity of language we have the testimony legacy of natural of the British Empire even though Britain has remained alive). And after the Second World War ended and the Soviet Union collapsed in 1989 During and after that stage, not the United States engage with the States of petroleum individual that is, they did not deal with Venezuela or Saudi Arabia or Iran, but they deal with the issue of petroleum in a holistic manner and one and all stages of production from the stage of research and exploration Then extraction and even refining and marketing, but that entry into the war, the tripartite aggression against Egypt were not Egypt is the landing as it was the target Hua open the gate to the Middle East to the ambitions of America and was also not the liberation of Kuwait from Iraqi occupation of love for humanity as it was to preserve oil wealth in Kuwait and the desire of them in direct control of the oil of Iraq and send Andhira to Iran's oil. Thus setting the centers of polarization, German, Japanese and Chinese in particular and Western Europe in general, under American influence through its control over the energy sources of funding direct. Therefore, the United States did not deal with oil anywhere in the world commodity abstract an exceptionally important in world trade as it dealt with as a cause of presence and domination and subjugation, especially after the failure of the modern world to find a successful alternative or Moawad strategic him distract the focus of American loosening of its grip on oil resources.