Through our follow-up for the US elections I considered writing after Iowa and New Hampshire direct elections, an election which many Americans see what they are given significant for the future of the general election indicators. Let's start with the story from the beginning, Tarah in question why American voter chose initially to be Iowa and then New Hampshire usher in the primaries, both Etan and hardly works for them account in the US Congress for their small sizes. It not merely represents the number of delegates to the state of both Iowa and New Hampshire, two percent of the proportion of the delegates at the two parties to be held next June in order to choose a candidate for each party.
There is no apparent reason for the initiation of the initial American elections in both Iowa and New Hampshire in the first and the ninth of February, respectively, only that those two states lawmakers in Congress have fought more than others in order to receive their mandates that privilege. Every four years becomes two Allocating the focus of attention and interest in the largest of the candidates, as well as voter American general, they do not doubt Attica trends have significance for the future of the candidates, which helps them to find adequate funding for the continuation of Hm lat Ham and attract media attention and appeal to independent voters, the voter, AC, and that those two states also represent borderline decisions to withdraw by the candidates. Today there is a contraction in the number of Republicans to six candidates after their number exceeds the Dozen.
***Before
the elections, the results of the analysis of each of the states of
Iowa and New Hampshire should be noted briefly to the election method
used in the United States generally. Each
state of their own way and in accordance with the law of the state,
where there was no federal law that regulates elections at the level of
the United States as a whole. While
the election is held in the state of New Hampshire by secret ballot or
show of hands, the elections in Iowa are through the formation of
communities and constituencies independent in every neighborhood to
elect the candidate that reach almost to one thousand six hundred
circle. These
circuits are known Pal caucus, and where the election is either by
secret ballot or by holding workshops mini-debate in a civil attempts to
appeal to the largest number of potential votes for the candidate. And
it has a lot of candidates simulating the campaigns of President Obama
earlier through direct personal contact with voters or to dispatch
volunteers to the voter to encourage him to vote, bringing the number of
volunteers to the tens of thousands. Electoral process is tedious and stressful process for the candidate and the American voter, alike.And came Iowa and New Hampshire this year's election with a number of surprises. First,
the unusual convergence between the Democratic candidates, Clinton
Sanders, where Clinton won B49.8% while Sanders won 49.6% of the votes
of Democrats in Iowa, a difference of two percent of the vote. Something which hardly gives us an indication of the potential candidates in the party elections. Then
a surprise sweep resounding Sanders came in the New Hampshire election
sixty percent of the vote compared to just under forty percent for
Clinton. And it clarified Sanders strength in attracting liberals and
independents vote in the Democratic Party, and will in the future battle
between the candidates in mobilizing voices of minorities to acquire
the largest possible number of African-Americans and Latinos
.
In a third surprise, Sandra proud that he was able to mobilize young donors and the collection of more than twenty million dollars during the month of January alone of more than seven thousand voters, which makes it completely independent and not subject to any pressure from donors and stakeholders. Politicians, the media and commented that the success of Sanders to mobilize such a huge amount of funding similar to IBM's election campaigns will enable him to continue to compete against Clinton until the end, IE until the party congress and he alone will decide who will be its candidate in the end.
And those surprises came fourth in the decline of Trump provided for in Iowa, where he swept the cruise Senator from Texas sounds conservatives hold a higher proportion of sounds at all, believing that he has achieved success will be well positioned to become a likely candidate for the Republican Party. However, he quickly regained his popularity Trump won in New Hampshire, thirty-five percent of the vote Cruz slipped to third place after the governor of Ohio, John Kazoos in another surprise. The intense rivalry between the Republican candidates, who are both Trump and Cruz Ru bio and Bush Kazoos. Unlike Trump, who is an outsider to the party's four candidates vying for the party's nomination as they comply with his policies and believe in his leadership.
***He graduated this electoral battle for the scope of the familiar, the war fought between all of the institutions of the two parties on the one hand, and the American people on the other hand, more than doing between the presidential candidates themselves. And it appeared evident after continued adherence to both Sanders and Trump in control in the primaries. And received their criticism directed at institutions of the party and the politicians in Washington resonate with the American voter, pushing each other to escalate its campaign and expose the biased and Washington's policies against the majority of the American people. Sanders and unique to criticize the greed of Wall Street giant institutions and the banking system, which does not care only achieve profitability without regard balances of the national economy and its requirements. Although parking both Trump and Sanders on the contrary, they agree on one thing which is important to have the voters loud and influential voice in this election, and edit the rich elite, which only serve their own interests, as Leora themselves more worthy than others in providing innovative leadership of the two parties and attract electoral base, which is located outside of the services offered by the two institutions for the elite circle. It is that rule which sees sovereign right to impose itself in this year's elections.
While Hillary Clinton Astrid in troubled waters and weakening of the candidates outside the scope of the enterprise is seeking to emphasize that it is best suited candidate the only one who is capable of implementing the promises and achieve tangible results in dealing with Congress and the institutions of Washington, because of their experience and knowledge of insiders in Washington. It is not the best is to exaggerate his promises and failures in implementation, the first hint of Grim ha Sanders, but the most efficient is the most realistic and which is committed to what it promises to the electorate.
The Clinton to step up its criticism against Sanders after the overwhelming success in New Hampshire as it is merely a lame duck with no experience in his backstage maneuvering between Washington and in the face of Congress, saying that Congress is capable of paralyzing completely since the first day. It seems that Clinton is the only one to look after the primary and general elections by standing on more solid ground.
In a third surprise, Sandra proud that he was able to mobilize young donors and the collection of more than twenty million dollars during the month of January alone of more than seven thousand voters, which makes it completely independent and not subject to any pressure from donors and stakeholders. Politicians, the media and commented that the success of Sanders to mobilize such a huge amount of funding similar to IBM's election campaigns will enable him to continue to compete against Clinton until the end, IE until the party congress and he alone will decide who will be its candidate in the end.
And those surprises came fourth in the decline of Trump provided for in Iowa, where he swept the cruise Senator from Texas sounds conservatives hold a higher proportion of sounds at all, believing that he has achieved success will be well positioned to become a likely candidate for the Republican Party. However, he quickly regained his popularity Trump won in New Hampshire, thirty-five percent of the vote Cruz slipped to third place after the governor of Ohio, John Kazoos in another surprise. The intense rivalry between the Republican candidates, who are both Trump and Cruz Ru bio and Bush Kazoos. Unlike Trump, who is an outsider to the party's four candidates vying for the party's nomination as they comply with his policies and believe in his leadership.
***He graduated this electoral battle for the scope of the familiar, the war fought between all of the institutions of the two parties on the one hand, and the American people on the other hand, more than doing between the presidential candidates themselves. And it appeared evident after continued adherence to both Sanders and Trump in control in the primaries. And received their criticism directed at institutions of the party and the politicians in Washington resonate with the American voter, pushing each other to escalate its campaign and expose the biased and Washington's policies against the majority of the American people. Sanders and unique to criticize the greed of Wall Street giant institutions and the banking system, which does not care only achieve profitability without regard balances of the national economy and its requirements. Although parking both Trump and Sanders on the contrary, they agree on one thing which is important to have the voters loud and influential voice in this election, and edit the rich elite, which only serve their own interests, as Leora themselves more worthy than others in providing innovative leadership of the two parties and attract electoral base, which is located outside of the services offered by the two institutions for the elite circle. It is that rule which sees sovereign right to impose itself in this year's elections.
While Hillary Clinton Astrid in troubled waters and weakening of the candidates outside the scope of the enterprise is seeking to emphasize that it is best suited candidate the only one who is capable of implementing the promises and achieve tangible results in dealing with Congress and the institutions of Washington, because of their experience and knowledge of insiders in Washington. It is not the best is to exaggerate his promises and failures in implementation, the first hint of Grim ha Sanders, but the most efficient is the most realistic and which is committed to what it promises to the electorate.
The Clinton to step up its criticism against Sanders after the overwhelming success in New Hampshire as it is merely a lame duck with no experience in his backstage maneuvering between Washington and in the face of Congress, saying that Congress is capable of paralyzing completely since the first day. It seems that Clinton is the only one to look after the primary and general elections by standing on more solid ground.
***And
last but not least, this election poses the important question, whether
America was already ready to fight a political and economic revolution
demanded by Sanders. Or is it in the end, will up its mind which is the most likely in the middle in the Personal Hillary Clinton. The American voter is at a crossroads, you will continue to campaign
against the institutions or whether it will be heading back to the
center and in the end, one whose fate and status quot.
And we can say that we are in this election, in front of the Americas, the primaries proved to split America into two teams far apart ideologically, America progressive and actress for electors Sanders pro for political revolution, economic and introduce the concept of social justice and study free in the state health insurance universities, all of which are emerging concepts for the voters and the American policies partisan, extremist right-wing American actress electors Cruz Ru bio and to a lesser extent Trump, who is demanding the other to revolt against the corruption of politicians in Washington. It will ideologies war raging in the big states inhabited by the rich and major companies such as Texas, California and Florida.
Even if the Jazz us predicted Hillary Clinton's victory in the end, because the voter's US still embrace the capitalist system and it is not yet ready to embrace the ideas of Sanders under the allegedly extremist left-wing ideas, while they are not asking for more than it is applied in practise in European countries, both for justice social or public health and guaranteed for all insurance. What Sanders achieved success in Iowa and New Hampshire is a success For his ideas. In conclusion, what can not be underestimated is that this election has opened the door to the general public because something to say and to recognize the repercussions and cons of the policy elite in Washington.
And we can say that we are in this election, in front of the Americas, the primaries proved to split America into two teams far apart ideologically, America progressive and actress for electors Sanders pro for political revolution, economic and introduce the concept of social justice and study free in the state health insurance universities, all of which are emerging concepts for the voters and the American policies partisan, extremist right-wing American actress electors Cruz Ru bio and to a lesser extent Trump, who is demanding the other to revolt against the corruption of politicians in Washington. It will ideologies war raging in the big states inhabited by the rich and major companies such as Texas, California and Florida.
Even if the Jazz us predicted Hillary Clinton's victory in the end, because the voter's US still embrace the capitalist system and it is not yet ready to embrace the ideas of Sanders under the allegedly extremist left-wing ideas, while they are not asking for more than it is applied in practise in European countries, both for justice social or public health and guaranteed for all insurance. What Sanders achieved success in Iowa and New Hampshire is a success For his ideas. In conclusion, what can not be underestimated is that this election has opened the door to the general public because something to say and to recognize the repercussions and cons of the policy elite in Washington.
